The Politics of Benevolence: Political Patronage of Party-Based Charitable Organizations in Contemporary Indonesian Islam

Hilman Latief

Abstract


The rise of party-based Islamic charities has had a profound impact on the nature of philanthropic activities in contemporary Indonesia, and stimulated a new debate over the issue of the politics of benevolent acts. Over the past few years, in line with the increase of the influence of the Islamic factor in Indonesian politics, there have been a number of political parties which actively engaged with social welfare activities through the newly-established Islamic charitable organizations. The close ties between charitable organizations and political parties may lead to the new patterns of Muslim social and political activism, and to the new forms of political clientelism. This article analyzes the vibrant effort of political parties in sponsoring the inception and operation of Islamic charitable organizations in the post New Order era, and investigates how political clientelism has been established through charity practices. This paper compares the roles of charitable organizations set up by the nationalist and Islamist parties in formulating strategies to promote their political interest. Based on three political parties studied in this article, which are the Prosperous Justice Party (PKS), Golkar Party, and the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P), this paper argues that the practice of charity has become a popular way used by politicians to patronize their constituents, but at the same time, this practice has weakened the Muslim perspective of development and social change.

[Munculnya lembaga-lembaga amal yang dikelola oleh partai politik berpengaruh luas terhadap aktifitas filantropi di Indonesia dan memicu perdebatan seputar politik-kedermawanan. Dalam beberapa tahun terakhir, selaras dengan semakin meningkatnya pengaruh Islam dalam lanskap politik Indonesia, partai-partai politik juga berlomba-lomba untuk terlibat aktif dalam aktifitas filantropi dengan mendirikan lembaga amal. Ikatan kuat antara partai politik dan lembaga amal tersebut tentu berpotensi melahirkan pola aktivisme sosial-politik Islam dan bentuk baru clientisme-politik. Artikel ini akan mengulas upaya keras partai politik dalam mendirikan dan mengendalikan lembaga-lembaga amal pasca Orde Baru dan menjelaskan bagaimana clientisme dapat terbentuk melalui aktifitas amal. Artikel ini akan membandingkan peran lembaga-lembaga amal yang didirikan oleh partai politik nasionalis dan Islam dalam menyusun strategi untuk menyukseskan agenda politik mereka. Dengan menganalisis tiga partai politik, Partai Keadilan Sejahtera/PKS, Partai Demokrasi Indonesia-Perjuangan/PDI-P, dan Golongan Karya/Golkar, penulis berargumen bahwa aktifitas amal semakin populer di kalangan politisi sebagai cara menarik simpati konstituen, tetapi pada saat yang sama, praktik tersebut semakin memperlemah cara pandang umat Islam mengenai pembangunan dan perubahan sosial.]


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alagha, Jopeh Elie, The Shift in Hizbullah’s Ideology: religious Ideology, Political ideology, and Political Program, Amsterdam & Leiden: ISIM and Amsterdam University Press, 2006.

Aspinall, Edward and Weiss, Meredith L., “The Limit of Civil Society: Social Movements and Political parties in Southeast Asia,” in Richard Robinson (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics, London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 213-228.

Baswedan, Anis Rasyid, “Political Islam in Indonesia: Present and Future Trajectory,” Asian Survey, vol. 44. No. 5, 2004, pp. 669-690 [DOI: 10.1525/as.2004.44.5.669].

Bruinessen, Martin van,“Genealogy of Islamic Radicalism in Post-Soeharto Indonesia,” South East Asia Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 2002, pp. 117-154 [DOI: 10.5367/000000002101297035].

Bruinessen, Martin van, and Farid Wajidi, “Syu’un Ijtima’iyah and the Kiai Rakyat: Traditionalist Islam, Civil Society and Social Concern,” in Henk Schulte Nordholt (ed.), Indonesian Transitions, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2006, pp. 205-248.

Buehler, Michael, “Shari’a By-Laws in Indonesian Districts: An Indication for Changing Patterns of Power Accumulation and Political Corruption,” Southeast Asia Research, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2008 [DOI: 10.5367/000000008785260473].

Burr, J. Miliard and Collins, Roberts O., Alms for Jihad: Charity and Terrorism in the Islamic World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

Bush, Robin, “Regional Shari’a regulation in Indonesia, Anomaly or Symptom?” in Greg Fealy and Sally White (eds.), Expressing Islam: Religious Life and Politics in Indonesia, Singapore: ISEAS, 2008, pp. 174-191.

----, Nahdlatul Ulama and the Power within Islam and Politics in Indonesia. Singapore: ISEAS, 2009.

Durac, Vincent, “Entrenching Authoritarianism or Promoting Reform? Civil Society in Contemporary Yemen,” in Francesco Cavatorta (ed.), Civil Society Activism under Authoritarian Regime. London: Routledge, 2013.

Effendy, Bahtiar, Islam and the State in Indonesia, Singapore: ISEAS, 2004.

Effendy, Bahtiar et. al. (eds.). Beringin Membangun: Sejarah Politik Partai GOLKAR. Jakarta: Grafindo, 2012.

Eldridge, Phillip J., Non-Government Organizations and Democratic Participation in Indonesia, Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 1995.

----, “NGOs in Indonesia: Popular Movement or Arm of Government,” The Centre of Southeasian Studies, Monash University, 1989.

Fauzia, Amelia, Faith and the State: A History of Islamci Philanthropy in Indonesia, Leiden: Brill, 2013.

----, “Religious Practices: Zakat (Almsgiving): Indonesia.” in Suad Joseph (ed.), Encyclopedia of Women & Islamic Cultures, Brill Online, 2013.

Fealy, Greg & Benhard Platzdasch, “The Masyumi Legacy: Between Islamist Idealism and Political Exigency,” Studia Islamika, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2005. pp. 75-99.

Ganie-Rochman, Meuthia, An Uphill Struggle: Advocacy NGOs under Soeharto’s New Order, Jakarta: LabSosio Universitas Indonesia, 2002.

Hadiwinata, Bob, The Politics of NGOs in Indonesia: Developing Democracy and Managing Movement, London: RoudledgeCurzon, 1999.

Hamayotsu, Kikue, “The Political Rise of the Prosperous Justice Party in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: Examining the Political Economy of Islamist Mobilization in a Muslim Democracy,” Asian Survey, Vol. 51, Number 5, 2011. pp. 971-992 [DOI: 10.1525/as.2011.51.5.971].

Hadiz, Vedi R., “Democracy and Money Politics: the Case of Indonesia,” in Richard Robinson (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Southeast Asian Politics, Oxon: Routledge, 2012, pp. 71-82.

Hasrul Hanif, “Politik Klientelisme Baru dan Dilema Demokratisasi di Indonesia,” Jurnal Sosial & Politik (JSP), Volume 12 No.3 (2009), pp. 348-349.

Harmsen, Egbert, Islam, Civil Society and Social Work: Muslim Voluntary Welfare Associations in Jordan between Patronage and Empowerment, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2008.

Hasan, Noorhaidi, “Islamist Party, Electoral Politics and Da’wa Mobilization among Youth: The Prosperous Justcie Party (PKS) in Indoensia,” RSIS Working paper, Singapore, 2009.

Hefner, Robert W., “Islam, State and Civil Society: ICMI and the Struggle for the Indonesian Middle Class,” Indonesia (Ithaca), No. 56, 1993, pp. 1-35.

----, Civil Islam: Muslim and Democratization in Indonesia, Princeton University Press, 2000.

----, “Indonesia in the Global Scheme of Islamic Things: Sustaining of the Virtuous Circle of Education, Associations and Democracy,” in Jajat Burhanuddin and Kees van Dijk (eds.), Islam in Indonesia: Contrasting Images and Interpretations, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2013, pp. 49-62.

Klinken, Gerry van & Barker, Joshua (eds.), State of Authority: the State in Society in Indonesia, Ithaca: Cornell University, 2009.

Latief, Hilman, “Youth, Mosques, and Islamic Activism: Islamic Source Books in University-based Halaqah,” Kultur: the Indonesian Journal for Muslim Culture, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2010, pp. 63-88.

----, ‘Health Provision for the Poor: Islamic Aid and the Rise of Charitable Clinics in Indonesia’, South East Asia Research, 18 (3), 2010, pp. 503-225 [DOI: 10.5367/sear.2010.0004].

----, Islamic Charities and Social Activism: Welfare, Dakwah and Politics in Indonesia, Ph.D Dissertation, Utrecht University, 2012.

----, “Islam and Humanitarian Affairs: the Middle Class and New Patterns of Social Activism,” in Kees van Dijk and Jajat Burhanuddin (eds.), Islam in Indonesia: Contrasting Images and Interpretations, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2013, pp. 173-194.

Leiken, Robert S. and Brooke, Steven.,“The Moderate Muslim Brotherhood,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 2, 2001, pp. 107-121.

Levitt, Matthew, HAMAS: Politics, Charity and Terrorism in the Service of Jihad, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2006.

Madinier, Rémy and Feillard, Andrée, At the Source of Indonesian Political Islam’s Failure: the Split between the Nahdlatul Ulama and the Masyumi in Retrospect,” Studia Islamika, Vol. 6 No. 2, 1999, pp. 1-38.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2013.512.337-363

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2013 Hilman Latief